🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive action to restrict social media access for young people below 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Politicians, safety advocates, and families are monitoring closely to see if this tactic will become a template for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Trend

Throughout Europe, a rising group of states are moving toward comparable bans.

• The Danish government plans a ban on social media for under-15s, with the leader declaring that smartphones and platforms are "taking away our children's innocence". Legislation could be formalized soon.
• Norway is planning to implement a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to shield children from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to confirm the age and identity of social media users. Officials have indicated that an similar ban is "one of the tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged parliament to approve a law lifting the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a similar step, including an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has urged parents to prevent their kids from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has passed a advisory resolution demanding a ban for under-16s without guardian approval is granted. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" design of these services, the step does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A strong age restriction is a useful foundation," commented the parliamentarian behind the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Approach

For the United Kingdom, the government has remained open to a possible ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but insisting any action must be "supported by strong evidence".

Last year, interest built behind a bill to introduce limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end weakened. However, the administration committed to further research the issue.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. One foundation established by the loved ones of a girl who took her own life after viewing dangerous social media material contends that a blanket age ban may not improve online safety and could result in a "dangerous transition" of harm when users turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the failure of the social media companies to design tools that are appropriate and suitable for children," said a leading peer.

The United States: A Fragmented Landscape

In the United States, action is largely occurring at the state government level amid federal stalemate.

• Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a bill banning children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a law capping minors to a single hour of social media access per day, with any further use needing adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise introduced measures mandating guardian approval for teenagers to set up social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from some figures to copy this lead, a federal ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Perspectives

Apart from these regions, additional countries are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for teenagers effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the required age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, global organizations adopt a more nuanced tone. A major UN agency has warned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "may even prove counterproductive". The agency highlights that the internet can be a "vital connection" for marginalized youth and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to prioritize safety.

Even as this international debate evolves, the steps of Australia and several other countries demonstrate that states around the world are less and less willing to stand by for tech companies to make changes on their own.